A thought/question

What is the point of the well-rounded style? It says it is average at everything, nothing more. Yet, on a specialist class, such as close combat, it says they are pretty epic at strength and speed/ speed techniques, which is understandable. The thing is, it says their drawback is range, energy technique power, etc, but in () it says average at best. Meaning the drawback would still match a well-rounded in said attribute. Atleast by the wording. So, ya, what's the point in said style?

It's for people who wanna be rounded, not specializing in specific attributes?

I understand what he is saying. He is saying that the specialist type, by fault of a likely erroneous message in the style topic, I might add, have notable skills in their respective specialized fields, while never falling below 'average at best' within the other categories. In other words, it is not a drawback at all, when the well-rounded get average at all attributes. As this is the case, one would opt to be of the specialist class, getting specialist perks... while still being average at the rest of the attributes.

He raises a valid point and as Kieriel said, I understood it the same way.

let's say Bob (the builder) is a well rounded fighter.

He get's a
B- running
B- Jumping
B- Punching

Tom who's a speedy fighter gets
A- Running
B- Jumping
B- Punching

Shouldn't the correct grading for Tom be
A- Running
C- Jumping
C- Punching?

This can be solved simply by making the well rounded class not average at all, but above average, using Izaya's logic, giving them all B's and giving the specialists all Cs. (Except for one or two A's.)

I agree.